Have you two guys ever spoken outside of email? I suggest that a phone call
may be a quicker way to resolve these issues than continuing public debate
:)  Feelings are running high and "face-to-face" communication may cut
across any misunderstandings.

Kind regards


P.

------------------------Original Message------------------------
-- Date:    Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:53:50 -0700
-- Sender:  Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:29:44PM -0700, Paul Sisson wrote:
>> On Monday 01 October 2001 12:46, Joe Rhett wrote:
>> > I've filed a few bugs with the OpenSRS-SF project. Paul Sisson just
>> > deletes them without fixing them, querying about them or resolving
>> > the problem.
>> 
>> I will respond off-list to this message. After I responded to the bug 
>> report with a simple answer, this person attacked me as a "babbling 
>> idiot", among other things, and the (invalid) bug was thus deleted.
>  
> You responded to the bug report with a statement about a module that I
> didn't report a problem with, and did _not_ respond to the actual issue
> raised.
> 
>> As one can see from the original subject line (and the abusive tone of 
>> the message body), meaningful communication with this person is 
>> somewhat difficult.
> 
> When I tried to follow up to make sure the bug was fixed, you ignored the
> update and deleted the bug again. You never attempted meaningful
> communication in the first place. Communication requires a two-way
> information flow, of which there was none. You didn't even ACK the report.
> 
> Second, you clearly misunderstand the word 'abuse'. I have never abused
> you. I was acerbic and concise in one reply to you -- where I pointed out
> that you replied to a non-issue, and didn't reply to the issues raised.
> You focused on the word 'babbling' and ignored everything else I said 
> -- exactly like you did with the original bug report.
> 
> If you ignore the report contents and talk about some other random topic,
> someone might refer to you as 'babbling'. It's not abusive, it is pointing
> out that your replies aren't linear and relevant to the issue.
> 
> I appreciate that you took this offline, but this public attack serves no
> good. You're attempting to justify the fact that you didn't feel it
> necessary to follow through with someone about the bug they reported.
> 
> -- 
> Joe Rhett                                                      Chief Geek
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                      ISite Services, Inc.

----------------------End Original Message----------------------




---
Peter Dickson

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kyros Solutions Ltd
110 The Custard Factory  Gibb Street  Birmingham  B9 4AA
t: +44 (0)121 683 1330         w: http://www.kyros.co.uk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ passionate about helping people use information technology effectively ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


---
Fingerprint: 02DB 023B C11B 412C D015  0AF3 F074 8590 72D2 BC98


Reply via email to