afaik the key generation is immediate.  And I don't believe there's a verify
script - I'll see if we can't get one added simply (hacked out from the
verify_install.cgi that comes with the current iteration of our client
code).

Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product Manager
Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Michael J. Masin
> Sent: October 31, 2001 9:50 AM
> To: Charles Daminato
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OPS Decode Error: Envelope Protocol Not Supported
>
>
>
> >Hrm... Can you get to horizon:55000 from your system's command
> line?  Have
> >you ensured the key you're using was generated on horizon, has no leading
> >or trailing spaces or line breaks, etc?
>
> Either it self-corrected overnight or I've been sleep walking. I should
> give the night-shift elves a raise. Could there a time lag when a new key
> is generated to when it's activated?
>
> >   What happens when you run the
> >install verifier?
>
> I installed using the auto-install script (which doesn't know about the
> HTML::Entities pre-req.) and it claimed success on the
> authentication, but
> order.cgi crashed last night. I don't see a stand-alone verifier
> script, is
> there one in the sourceforge client?
>
> thx!
> m2
>
> >Charles Daminato
> >TUCOWS Product Manager
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Michael J. Masin wrote:
> >
> > > I just installed SF/1.43 and I'm getting
> > >
> > > Authentication Error: Authentication failed: OPS Decode
> Error: Envelope
> > > Protocol Not Supported
> > >
> > > when I check domain availability.
> > >
> > > generated a new key
> > > remote_host = horizon.opensrs.net
> > > remote_port = 55000
> > >
> > > What did I miss?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > m2
> > > __________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Michael J. Masin, President
> > > Cybervisors, Inc. - Web Site Design and Development
> > > 800-984-9451 (Int'l +1 212-333-9557)
> > > http://www.cybervisors.net/
> > > __________________________________________________
> > >
>

Reply via email to