how do you successfully run when you can not see! It doesn't work in track very well. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lynn W. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:59 AM Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF
> I'm sure those who are successfully running NT will disagree. > > OpenSRS runs fine on NT. The appropriate documentation is at > http://www.atlcon.net/opensrs -- Eric Longman has done a great job keeping > all of this current, and keeping the appropriate perl modules in PPM format > (so you don't have to build them). > > -- Lynn > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael L. Dean > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:44 AM > To: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > my suggestion: move from NT for serious work. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM > Subject: OpenSRS-SF > > > > I have been trying to get this to work on NT but am having a helluva time > > finding the right versions of packages and modules for perl. The > automated > > install broke miserably but I manually built (with VC6) expat and the > > XML::Parser and got a lot of the packages installed but when I verify I > get > > protocol not supported...from the code this looks like something is wrong > > with the XML parser... > > > > Has anyone got any suggestions or has anyone else gotten this to work on > NT? > > (docs say it should work fine) > > > > -bryanw > > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Colin Viebrock > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:06 AM > > To: Scott Allan > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Client innovation > > > > > > > > 1. Hard cut: make SF official and only "innovate" on that version. > This > > > > would mean that any new functionality would only be developed by us > ion > > > > that code base > > > > > > My choice is this one.d > > > > I agree. Don't spread your resources thin (but do continue to support the > > old > > codebase). > > > > However, I think that there *might* be some issues between the SF > developers > > and > > some RSP developers who contribute patches back to OpenSRS (just read the > > archives > > for email from Joe Rhett for examples). > > > > I have no idea what the situation is, nor do I really care too much. But > if > > OpenSRS > > is going to move into a more transparent development system like > > SourceForge, you > > will need to be prepared for Joe Public offering patches/suggestions/etc.. > > Not all > > developers work well in this environment. I hope the people working on > the > > SF client > > are ready to deal with this input, both technically and personally. > > > > - Colin > > > > > > > > > >
