Ahh. Now we're onto something. I haven't done anything with the SF version in a few releases, so I wasn't aware that it now requires V2.30 of XML Parser. If that's truly the case, then I'll look into downloading it from CPAN and getting a PPD out on my site.
BUT...protocol not supported when connecting to the test server may actually be something different. You may want to verify that your config files are set to go against port 55000 and not the older 51000. I think that could cause the error. Regards, Eric Longman Atl-Connect Internet Services +-------------------------------------------------------+ | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net | | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 | | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +-------------------------------------------------------+ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WebWiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF Yeah...It is...but the SF version says it requires version 2.30. I have tried installing that and the verify_install still complains...i think I messed up the installation of this but the side effect is that it says "protocol not supported" when connecting to the test server. -bryanw HalfPriceNames Domain Registry http://www.halfpricenames.com/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Daminato Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:03 PM To: WebWiz Cc: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OpenSRS-SF BTW - XML::Parser has been required for OpenSRS since v2.2 Charles Daminato TUCOWS Product Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, WebWiz wrote: > What's curious about this is that I don't recall having > to install XML::Parser...seems like it was already there. > In fact, I just checked a couple of other systems that > have never seen OSRS, and they've got XML-Parser on them. > I'm 99% certain that XML-Parser is included with the > ActiveState distribution. > > If it's not on my site, generally that means that it's > either included with the ActivePerl distribution or it's > readily available from ActiveState. I don't duplicate the > modules that they have made available, because I don't > want the hassle of keeping mine up to date. > > Just to check, launch PPM and do: > > PPM> query XML > > If you get back > > XML-Parser [2.27] A Perl module for parsing XML documents > > Then it's already installed. > > I believe the SF docs say that 2.28 is required. In fact > everything works fine with 2.27. > > Regards, > Eric Longman > Atl-Connect Internet Services > > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net | > | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 | > | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Lynn W. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:40 PM > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > Thanks for the assist...the XML::Parser module is missing on Eric's > site...it is not used for the current version from the OpenSRS site. I am > anxious to try out the billing code on the new stuff as well as integrate my > enhancements using hooks so that I don't fall victim to the need to > constantly redo all my changes every time a new version is released...other > than those things, I too am happy with the current version. But my billing > system does need work and it seemed like a better investment of my time to > upgrade and use the version coming out instead of reinventing everything the > next time we are forced to upgrade by significant enhancements/bug fixes, > etc. > > Anyway...thanks for all the help...if(when) I get it working I will > contribute my 2cents as well...:) > > -bryanw > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lynn W. Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:35 PM > To: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > Bryan, > > Eric has the appropriate modules already compiled -- he gave the URL in an > earlier message. I think he's mentioned the SourceForge version as well. > > I'm sure he'd like to know if any were missing. > > We're in no great rush to get on the SourceForge version as I don't think it > adds much at this point, so I can't comment on it directly. > > -- Lynn > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Waters > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:28 AM > To: Lynn W. Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > Nope...missed the question. > > I'm running my entire site on NT using OpenSRS...i'm talking about the > SourceForge version which is the next generation of OpenSRS...i'm trying to > upgrade. I have used Eric's site to great advantage in getting my current > site up and running quickly. > > Thanks though... > > -bryanw > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Lynn W. Taylor > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > I'm sure those who are successfully running NT will disagree. > > OpenSRS runs fine on NT. The appropriate documentation is at > http://www.atlcon.net/opensrs -- Eric Longman has done a great job keeping > all of this current, and keeping the appropriate perl modules in PPM format > (so you don't have to build them). > > -- Lynn > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael L. Dean > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:44 AM > To: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > my suggestion: move from NT for serious work. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM > Subject: OpenSRS-SF > > > > I have been trying to get this to work on NT but am having a helluva time > > finding the right versions of packages and modules for perl. The > automated > > install broke miserably but I manually built (with VC6) expat and the > > XML::Parser and got a lot of the packages installed but when I verify I > get > > protocol not supported...from the code this looks like something is wrong > > with the XML parser... > > > > Has anyone got any suggestions or has anyone else gotten this to work on > NT? > > (docs say it should work fine) > > > > -bryanw > > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Colin Viebrock > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:06 AM > > To: Scott Allan > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Client innovation > > > > > > > > 1. Hard cut: make SF official and only "innovate" on that version. > This > > > > would mean that any new functionality would only be developed by us > ion > > > > that code base > > > > > > My choice is this one.d > > > > I agree. Don't spread your resources thin (but do continue to support the > > old > > codebase). > > > > However, I think that there *might* be some issues between the SF > developers > > and > > some RSP developers who contribute patches back to OpenSRS (just read the > > archives > > for email from Joe Rhett for examples). > > > > I have no idea what the situation is, nor do I really care too much. But > if > > OpenSRS > > is going to move into a more transparent development system like > > SourceForge, you > > will need to be prepared for Joe Public offering patches/suggestions/etc.. > > Not all > > developers work well in this environment. I hope the people working on > the > > SF client > > are ready to deal with this input, both technically and personally. > > > > - Colin > > > > > > > > > > > > >
