Yeah...It is...but the SF version says it requires version 2.30. I have tried installing that and the verify_install still complains...i think I messed up the installation of this but the side effect is that it says "protocol not supported" when connecting to the test server.
-bryanw HalfPriceNames Domain Registry http://www.halfpricenames.com/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Daminato Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:03 PM To: WebWiz Cc: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OpenSRS-SF BTW - XML::Parser has been required for OpenSRS since v2.2 Charles Daminato TUCOWS Product Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, WebWiz wrote: > What's curious about this is that I don't recall having > to install XML::Parser...seems like it was already there. > In fact, I just checked a couple of other systems that > have never seen OSRS, and they've got XML-Parser on them. > I'm 99% certain that XML-Parser is included with the > ActiveState distribution. > > If it's not on my site, generally that means that it's > either included with the ActivePerl distribution or it's > readily available from ActiveState. I don't duplicate the > modules that they have made available, because I don't > want the hassle of keeping mine up to date. > > Just to check, launch PPM and do: > > PPM> query XML > > If you get back > > XML-Parser [2.27] A Perl module for parsing XML documents > > Then it's already installed. > > I believe the SF docs say that 2.28 is required. In fact > everything works fine with 2.27. > > Regards, > Eric Longman > Atl-Connect Internet Services > > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net | > | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 | > | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Lynn W. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:40 PM > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > Thanks for the assist...the XML::Parser module is missing on Eric's > site...it is not used for the current version from the OpenSRS site. I am > anxious to try out the billing code on the new stuff as well as integrate my > enhancements using hooks so that I don't fall victim to the need to > constantly redo all my changes every time a new version is released...other > than those things, I too am happy with the current version. But my billing > system does need work and it seemed like a better investment of my time to > upgrade and use the version coming out instead of reinventing everything the > next time we are forced to upgrade by significant enhancements/bug fixes, > etc. > > Anyway...thanks for all the help...if(when) I get it working I will > contribute my 2cents as well...:) > > -bryanw > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lynn W. Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:35 PM > To: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > Bryan, > > Eric has the appropriate modules already compiled -- he gave the URL in an > earlier message. I think he's mentioned the SourceForge version as well. > > I'm sure he'd like to know if any were missing. > > We're in no great rush to get on the SourceForge version as I don't think it > adds much at this point, so I can't comment on it directly. > > -- Lynn > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Waters > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:28 AM > To: Lynn W. Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > Nope...missed the question. > > I'm running my entire site on NT using OpenSRS...i'm talking about the > SourceForge version which is the next generation of OpenSRS...i'm trying to > upgrade. I have used Eric's site to great advantage in getting my current > site up and running quickly. > > Thanks though... > > -bryanw > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Lynn W. Taylor > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > I'm sure those who are successfully running NT will disagree. > > OpenSRS runs fine on NT. The appropriate documentation is at > http://www.atlcon.net/opensrs -- Eric Longman has done a great job keeping > all of this current, and keeping the appropriate perl modules in PPM format > (so you don't have to build them). > > -- Lynn > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael L. Dean > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:44 AM > To: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > my suggestion: move from NT for serious work. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM > Subject: OpenSRS-SF > > > > I have been trying to get this to work on NT but am having a helluva time > > finding the right versions of packages and modules for perl. The > automated > > install broke miserably but I manually built (with VC6) expat and the > > XML::Parser and got a lot of the packages installed but when I verify I > get > > protocol not supported...from the code this looks like something is wrong > > with the XML parser... > > > > Has anyone got any suggestions or has anyone else gotten this to work on > NT? > > (docs say it should work fine) > > > > -bryanw > > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Colin Viebrock > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:06 AM > > To: Scott Allan > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Client innovation > > > > > > > > 1. Hard cut: make SF official and only "innovate" on that version. > This > > > > would mean that any new functionality would only be developed by us > ion > > > > that code base > > > > > > My choice is this one.d > > > > I agree. Don't spread your resources thin (but do continue to support the > > old > > codebase). > > > > However, I think that there *might* be some issues between the SF > developers > > and > > some RSP developers who contribute patches back to OpenSRS (just read the > > archives > > for email from Joe Rhett for examples). > > > > I have no idea what the situation is, nor do I really care too much. But > if > > OpenSRS > > is going to move into a more transparent development system like > > SourceForge, you > > will need to be prepared for Joe Public offering patches/suggestions/etc.. > > Not all > > developers work well in this environment. I hope the people working on > the > > SF client > > are ready to deal with this input, both technically and personally. > > > > - Colin > > > > > > > > > > > > >
