hmmm probably using rented shell accesses to server not in the Tucows IP range ;-))))
Marc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lynn W. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:02 PM Subject: Re: Transfer Email > As I understand it, if the automated parser fails, the request falls through to a Mark I mod 0 human brain. > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 02:09:10 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >Sorry, I forgot about that! > > > >I do recall the last domains I transfered from GoDaddy to > >Tucows did get stalled and Tucows reported that the Whois > >was not parsable. > > > >I wonder how Tucows addressed / addresses the issue? > > > > > > > >On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:59:16 -0800 > > "Lynn W. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Since transfers require the gaining registrar to confirm > >>with the current admin. contact, and the only way to get > >>the admin. E-Mail address is to query the losing > >>registrar's WHOIS, I think blocking or falsifying data > >>would constitute restraint of trade. > >> > >>-- Lynn > >> > >>On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 23:45:43 -0700, Dave Warren wrote: > >>>Rate limit, provide a "Leave us the flack alone", > >>>whatever. But *DO NOT* > >>>provide fradulent data (If this is true). If a registrar > >>>wants to buy the > >>>WHOIS from another registrar, they can do so. > >>> > >>> > >>>---- Original Message ---- > >>>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:25 PM > >>>Subject: <?spam=BCC> Re: Transfer Email > >>> > >>>> Given how frequently some registrars rape other > >>>>registrars > >>>> Whois databases for renewals I don't think there is much > >>>> chance of successfully arguing against "protecting > >>>> oneself". This is also another reason why some > >>>>registrars > >>>> severely govern the rate at which you can query their > >>>> Whois. > >>>> > >>>> I'm espicially fed up with Register.Com doing this and > >>>> physically mailing me creatively worded renewals in > >>>>hopes > >>>> I'll screwup and renew with them ... They also throw in > >>>> variant names on top of it! > >> > >> > > > >
