On Friday, May 24, 2013 8:05:31 AM UTC-7, Mike Conley wrote:
> Sounds like we're talking about code review.
> 
> 
> 
> >> But I want to qualify "integration into bugzilla": I explicitly do not
> 
> >> want a tool that is tightly coupled to bugzilla.  In fact, I want a
> 
> >> tool that has as little to do with bugzilla as feasible.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm a contributor to the Review Board project[1], which is not coupled 
> 
> with Bugzilla whatsoever.
> 
This quarter, we've dug into looking at upgrading the review experience in 
Bugzilla. And after wrestling some more with splinter and webkit's 
code-review.js tool, we decided that review board is a whole lot better 
approach. We're working with IT to stand up a review board server that Bugzilla 
will make use of, so it won't be tightly coupled (as I understand it).

Cc'ing Glob and Mcote who can provide more details.

> 
> 
> It also has an extension called ReviewBot[2], which can run patches 
> 
> through static analysis or automated tests, and inject the results 
> 
> automatically into the review request as a ReviewBot review.
> 
That sounds like something else we should investigate in addition to Review 
Board.

Cheers,
Clint
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to