On Friday, May 24, 2013 8:05:31 AM UTC-7, Mike Conley wrote: > Sounds like we're talking about code review. > > > > >> But I want to qualify "integration into bugzilla": I explicitly do not > > >> want a tool that is tightly coupled to bugzilla. In fact, I want a > > >> tool that has as little to do with bugzilla as feasible. > > > > I'm a contributor to the Review Board project[1], which is not coupled > > with Bugzilla whatsoever. > This quarter, we've dug into looking at upgrading the review experience in Bugzilla. And after wrestling some more with splinter and webkit's code-review.js tool, we decided that review board is a whole lot better approach. We're working with IT to stand up a review board server that Bugzilla will make use of, so it won't be tightly coupled (as I understand it).
Cc'ing Glob and Mcote who can provide more details. > > > It also has an extension called ReviewBot[2], which can run patches > > through static analysis or automated tests, and inject the results > > automatically into the review request as a ReviewBot review. > That sounds like something else we should investigate in addition to Review Board. Cheers, Clint _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform