I said in irc yesterday that SeaMonkey is NOT ready yet, however I see no reason to change the plan of record. I expect us to have a good solution in less than a month. (As in yes go ahead and land that patch)
Thank you for the followup. On Dec 13, 2014 1:07 PM, "Ehsan Akhgari" <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Callek, can you please confirm that the Dec 15th date is still good for > you? I'm planning to land a patch to drop support for MSVC 2010 on that > day. > > Thanks! > Ehsan > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jeff Muizelaar <jmuizel...@mozilla.com> > wrote: >> >> I think that’s manageable. >> >> -Jeff >> >> On Oct 20, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> So I just spoke with Callek about his plans to move SeaMonkey off of >> their existing Windows 2003 builders that cannot install Visual Studio 2012 >> or newer, and it seems like Dec 15th is a date that will probably work fine >> for SM, and that is still within the Gecko 37 cycle. Jeff, can we hold off >> the Skia update plans until that date? >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Can you please ask them to not use variadic templates too? That also >>> seems to require MSVC 2013. >>> >>> >>> On 2014-10-16, 4:33 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: >>> >>>> Type aliasing requires 2013, but we can probably keep them from using >>>> that for now. I don’t think asking them to support VS2012 will be too much >>>> of a burden. >>>> >>>> -Jeff >>>> >>>> On Oct 16, 2014, at 4:29 PM, David Major <dma...@mozilla.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I was thinking it would be nice to support VS2010 as long as any of >>>>> our main channels use it -- meaning we could drop it on the first day of >>>>> 39. But I have no practical justification for that. If it causes a burden >>>>> on Skia work then it might be reasonable to switch sooner. >>>>> >>>>> This set: http://chromium-cpp.appspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>> What MS compiler does that list require? There's a number of people >>>>> building with VS2012, would that still be supported? >>>>> >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> >>>>>> From: "Jeff Muizelaar" <jmuizel...@mozilla.com> >>>>>> To: "Ehsan Akhgari" <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> >>>>>> Cc: "dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org list" < >>>>>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:14:19 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: Compiler version expectations >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler >>>>>>>> deprecation >>>>>>>> schedule is not very clear. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using >>>>>>>> GCC 4.4 >>>>>>>> for B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping support for building with >>>>>>>> VS2010 and >>>>>>>> GCC 4.4 in the near term. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> GCC is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1077549. No >>>>>>> specific >>>>>>> bug or plans for MSVC2010, but I'd be open to killing support for it >>>>>>> on >>>>>>> the next release train. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is important to us because Skia is planing on using more C++11 >>>>>>>> features in the near term and we’d like to continue updating from >>>>>>>> upstream. Are there reasons we can’t drop support for these >>>>>>>> compilers in >>>>>>>> the 37-38 time frame? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What C++11 features specifically? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This set: http://chromium-cpp.appspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jeff >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> dev-platform mailing list >>>>>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >>>>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ehsan >> >> >> > > -- > Ehsan > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
