On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
> Thanks David! > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:32 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > I'm particularly interested in review of point (3) in what I've written; > > I feel that the argument I've written so far is weak, I think because I > > don't particularly understand the concerns about the powerfulfeatures > > draft. > > So for what it's worth, I think I'm in disagreement with Eric about > what WebAppSec's role should/could be. Groups at the W3C that go at it > alone often make questionable choices when it comes to a number of > things that are not their expertise so having some amount of informal > oversight is definitely warranted. And the group of people that make > up WebAppSec definitely appears to have the competence. > I think there's some competence there, certainly, but I'm not convinced it represents a balanced set of the views on this topic. If there is to be oversight, it should probably be at that TAG level, IMHO. -Ekr _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
