> I think for release builds, we should have the following:

Thanks for this information! For reference, I've responded on the RFC to the 
technical bits here.

https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1513#issuecomment-200626686

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Ralph Giles wrote:
> > so unwinding through FFI is
> > something we need to think about.
> 
> I'd much prefer we didn't have to think about it. Since the semantics
> of panic!() are "game over", it makes sense to map it to MOZ_CRASH()
> to remove the possibility of cross-FFI unwinding.

FWIW I agree that this is likely the best way to think of panics in Gecko
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to