I used to think it should be called "Abstract". Sort of a summarization
of the bug itself.

dkl

On 04/12/2016 05:02 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
> This is probably a field that could stand to be re-labled, as I was
> blithely thinking (and I would guess others are) that it was for features,
> only.
> 
> -- Emma
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Mark Côté <mc...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-04-07 2:50 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
>>> (I'd much rather a bug report be editable text, with history
>>> available, for answers to these or similar questions -- rather than
>>> a stream of permanent comments.  But we seem stuck with the horrid
>>> stream-of-comments Bugzilla format, which means I try to ignore the
>>> comments as much as I can.  Then again, a 200 character summary is
>>> often good enough to answer the above 5 questions.  As with the rest
>>> of the Internet, don't read the comments.)
>>
>> Meant to reply to this earlier... BMO has a User Story field that sounds
>> like it does exactly what you want.  It's an editable field that keeps
>> history (admittedly not in an easy-to-read way, but that could be
>> improved).  Despite the name of the field, I've found it useful for
>> summarizing the current state of the discussion in the bug (sometimes
>> along with the "obsolete" comment tag).
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-platform mailing list
>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
> 

-- 
David Lawrence
d...@mozilla.com
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to