I used to think it should be called "Abstract". Sort of a summarization of the bug itself.
dkl On 04/12/2016 05:02 PM, Emma Humphries wrote: > This is probably a field that could stand to be re-labled, as I was > blithely thinking (and I would guess others are) that it was for features, > only. > > -- Emma > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Mark Côté <mc...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-04-07 2:50 AM, L. David Baron wrote: >>> (I'd much rather a bug report be editable text, with history >>> available, for answers to these or similar questions -- rather than >>> a stream of permanent comments. But we seem stuck with the horrid >>> stream-of-comments Bugzilla format, which means I try to ignore the >>> comments as much as I can. Then again, a 200 character summary is >>> often good enough to answer the above 5 questions. As with the rest >>> of the Internet, don't read the comments.) >> >> Meant to reply to this earlier... BMO has a User Story field that sounds >> like it does exactly what you want. It's an editable field that keeps >> history (admittedly not in an easy-to-read way, but that could be >> improved). Despite the name of the field, I've found it useful for >> summarizing the current state of the discussion in the bug (sometimes >> along with the "obsolete" comment tag). >> >> Mark >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-platform mailing list >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform >> > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > -- David Lawrence d...@mozilla.com _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform