CT is an accountability control, not an access control

We need both

Sent from my difference engine


> On Apr 14, 2015, at 18:05, Matt Palmer <mpal...@hezmatt.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:38:55PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>> On 2015-04-14 01:15, Peter Kurrasch wrote:
>>> Let's use an example. Suppose CNNIC issues a cert for whitehouse[dot]gov 
>>> and let's further suppose that CNNIC includes this cert in the CT data 
>>> since they have agreed to do that. What happens next?
>> 
>> What I've been wondering about is whether we need a mechanism where the CT
>> log should approve the transition from one issuer to an other.
> 
> NO.  A CT log is a *log*, not a gatekeeper.
> 
> - Matt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev-security-policy mailing list
> dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to