I don't want to spend too much time digressing into a discussion of the same
origin policy as a basis for a reasonable security model for the web, but I
hope we could all agree on one thing that was abundantly obvious twenty
years ago, and has only become more obvious:

Anything originally introduced by Netscape is horribly broken and needs to
be replaced.

-Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev-security-policy [mailto:dev-security-policy-
> bounces+tim.hollebeek=digicert....@lists.mozilla.org] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 2:41 PM
> To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
> Subject: Re: On the value of EV
> 
> On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 3:52:40 PM UTC-6, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> 
> > Yes. This is the foundation and limit of Web Security.
> >
> >
> https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GrbZLkNqUS91rgzMay4M15oOr3bYABO
> Whq1
> > K3U87RIo=?d=pHiUFZpus7xBKMLSCUAfZRndcniHFdqZrXgc-
> _r0FxYSwiMHScu8QgSvJy
> > E8LSHlko0v84eVoyDMoTZTqKVUvrQ_LxFgoZAq1f-
> Iw1ESfQHF0h4v_K1IjkBwaIhjNiNX
> > coOSGp7NnMokKR3ug1bd6esHHwnMamBgCwow-ecE3suQ9uS4-
> zfp_NLR0LWp-kXGqFhQqR
> > AfcAImdNz09yApHBItSOYOep3BWfyNMoDnHxlSQJaFx3zhDxV3a-
> AkndjySZN86maZVN5c
> > DBfq3b_73V2qS22vAabmGLFF5uZN8g8Lxstv8tiVTx9_BPzKFZVzWHsrnnheL-
> W3D22riT
> > AFkvNYWYFwJ1fHe0NpVNxMU3y4vi7I9_zIoxa24Fox-
> VmvQlMPLAbZZwHNAumWKMqIhjrt
> >
> k76Lk7EkqLehoiC9__j0qne7lDkDd47_&u=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%
> 2Fwi
> > ki%2FSame-origin_policy
> >
> > This is what is programatically enforced. Anything else either
> > requires new technology to technically enforce it (such as a new
> > scheme), or is offloading the liability to the user.
> >
> 
> The notion that a sub-resource load of a non-EV sort should downgrade the
EV
> display status of the page is very questionable.
> 
> I'm not sure we need namespace separation for EV versus non-EV
> subresouces.
> 
> The cause for this is simple:
> 
> It is the main page resource at the root of the document which causes each
> sub-resource to be loaded.
> 
> There is a "curatorship", if you will, engaged by the site author.  If
there are
> sub-resources loaded in, whether they are EV or not, it is the root page
> author's place to "take responsibility" for the contents of the DV or EV
> validated sub-resources that they cause to be loaded.
> 
> Frankly, I reduce third party origin resources to zero on web applications
on
> systems I design where those systems have strong security implications.
> 
> Of course, that strategy is probably not likely to be popular at Google,
which
> is, in a quite high percentage of instances, the target origin of all
kinds of sub-
> resources loaded in pages across the web.
> 
> If anyone takes the following comment seriously, this probably spawns an
> entirely separate conversation: I regard an EV certificate as more of a
code-
> signing of a given webpage / website and of the sub-resources whether or
not
> same origin, as they descend from the root page load.
> _______________________________________________
> dev-security-policy mailing list
> dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
> https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/oq_SYtg88dEoDRxJA115VhfXkFgyjy6paw
> HDkVPMqrM=?d=pHiUFZpus7xBKMLSCUAfZRndcniHFdqZrXgc-
> _r0FxYSwiMHScu8QgSvJyE8LSHlko0v84eVoyDMoTZTqKVUvrQ_LxFgoZAq1f-
> Iw1ESfQHF0h4v_K1IjkBwaIhjNiNXcoOSGp7NnMokKR3ug1bd6esHHwnMamBg
> Cwow-ecE3suQ9uS4-zfp_NLR0LWp-
> kXGqFhQqRAfcAImdNz09yApHBItSOYOep3BWfyNMoDnHxlSQJaFx3zhDxV3a-
> AkndjySZN86maZVN5cDBfq3b_73V2qS22vAabmGLFF5uZN8g8Lxstv8tiVTx9_B
> PzKFZVzWHsrnnheL-
> W3D22riTAFkvNYWYFwJ1fHe0NpVNxMU3y4vi7I9_zIoxa24Fox-
> VmvQlMPLAbZZwHNAumWKMqIhjrtk76Lk7EkqLehoiC9__j0qne7lDkDd47_&u
> =https%3A%2F%2Flists.mozilla.org%2Flistinfo%2Fdev-security-policy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to