In accordance with the CA inclusion process,[1] this is a summary of the
public discussion of Microsec’s application for inclusion of the e-Szigno
Root CA 2017 into the Mozilla root store, and to EV enable it and the
currently-included e-Szigno Root CA 2009. The request is documented in
Bugzilla #1445364.[2] The public discussion began on 9-March-2020.[3] The
email launching the public discussion and comments received during the
public discussion raised a number of issues, not all of which are itemized
here, including:

* the CPS was unclear about certificate problem reporting and revocation
request processing[4]; and

* Microsec has had systemic, standards-related non-conformities, e.g. Bug#
1622539[5], and needs to demonstrate better behavior in keeping up with and
complying with the CABF Baseline Requirements and root store policy.[6]

Microsec is resolving these concerns by:

- updating its CPS[7][8]; and

- committing to engage in better compliance with industry standards[9].

In my opinion Microsec has demonstrated sufficient response that we do not
need to remove Microsec from Mozilla’s root store. Therefore, once I am
satisfied after a review of the updated CPS, I am planning to recommend
that we approve the request to include the e-Szigno Root CA 2017
certificate and enable the websites trust bit. However, I plan to deny the
request for EV treatment for both root certificates. Microsec may re-apply
by filing a new request for EV treatment after they have demonstrated
improved compliance with the BRs and EV Guidelines.

I appreciate any feedback on this proposed course of action.

[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Application_Process#Process_Overview

[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1445364

[3]
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/jRKOr4nvOfY/QrhdAWq_AAAJ

[4]
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/jRKOr4nvOfY/KN-gnSLLAAAJ


[5] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1622539

[6]
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/jRKOr4nvOfY/T7hcaOYGAQAJ


[7]
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/rHTmKOzspCo/pyZKc40_CQAJ


[8]
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.security.policy/1L0crAafm30


[9]
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/jRKOr4nvOfY/mNFZGgXBAgAJ



On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:44 AM Sándor dr. Szőke via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:

>
> Dear Ben,
>
> I confirm that Microsec will correct all issues in the CP and CPS
> documents as promised during the public discussion.
>
> Thanks to everyone who took the time to read Microsec CP and CPS and to
> comment on them.
>
> If there are no more comments on the content of our CP and CPS documents
> in the public discussion, we will review the thread again and gather all
> the issues to be resolved.
> As usual, Microsec will review current versions of all applicable
> requirements for changes.
>
> I confirm that the section 1.5.2 will be changed. The High Priority
> Certificate Problem Report will be reviewed and will be moved here from
> section 4.9.3.
>
> Other issues I can see after a brief overview:
> - Preliminary report in case of Certificate problem report in section 4.9.5
> - correct the reference to section 1.3.1 instead of 1.2 in section 4.9.5
> - review the email address validation rules in case of non-automatic
> validation procedure in section 3.2.7
>
> I expect that Microsec will be able to do it within one week and will
> prepare the draft version of the public documents by the end of April.
>
> We publish the drafts on our website and send them to the auditor and our
> supervisory authority at the same time.
>
> This is followed by a 30-day commenting period during which anyone can
> comment on the planned changes.
> If significant issues arise during this period, the draft shall be amended
> and the 30 days shall begin again.
> If there are no significant issues, the new document will enter into force
> by the end of May 2020.
>
> Please let us know if you expect us to take any further steps in this
> process.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sándor
>
> dr. Sándor Szőke
> Microsec deputy director
> _______________________________________________
> dev-security-policy mailing list
> dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
>
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to