> My understanding is that neither the BRs or any Root Program require that 
> that subordinate CA key be weaker or equal in strength to the issuing CA's 
> key. 
> 
> Additionally, such a requirement would prohibit cross-signs where a "legacy" 
> root with a smaller key size would certify a new root CA with a stronger key. 
> For that reason, this illustrative control seems problematic. 
> 

Thanks, Corey. 
I also see it problematic, but I've been seeing other root programs (i.e. 
Spanish Government) enforcing this rule, so I'd like to understand if it's a 
"best practice" or a rule, and, in particular, if it's rule to be respected for 
TLS-oriented hierarchies.
P
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to