On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Lucas Adamski <[email protected]> wrote: > P.S. If that sounds a lot like a Feature Page, that's probably because it > wouldn't be a bad starting point. > Lucas.
IME, developers have been traditionally hesitant to design using feature pages, because there's no means for collaboration and discussion in a feature page, save mediawiki talk pages, which nobody uses (and for good reason). We're currently exploring an idea, collaborating, discussing, debating. All of this is IMO poorly suited to Mozilla's feature page system. > On 3/11/2012 4:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:41 PM, lkcl luke <[email protected]> wrote: >>> this is all really good stuff, jim. but i have to reiterate: WHERE >>> IS IT BEING FORMALLY DOCUMENTED? please don't say "in the mailing >>> list". >> Once we've had a bit more of a discussion here on the list, I think we >> should document everything both as part of the OWA documentation, as >> well as part of the general B2G documentation. But at this point I'm >> not sure that there is enough consensus to start editing wikis. >> >> / Jonas >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-security mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security > _______________________________________________ > dev-b2g mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
