I don't think the feature page should be the place for discussion, but it should track the discussion. As issues are raised, discussed & resolved, those would be mirrored in the feature page. Otherwise, important issues will be lost, and new participants will cannot synthesize a design from a huge fragmented thread. Lucas.
On 3/14/2012 11:30 AM, Justin Lebar wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Lucas Adamski <ladam...@mozilla.com> wrote: >> P.S. If that sounds a lot like a Feature Page, that's probably because it >> wouldn't be a bad starting point. >> Lucas. > IME, developers have been traditionally hesitant to design using > feature pages, because there's no means for collaboration and > discussion in a feature page, save mediawiki talk pages, which nobody > uses (and for good reason). > > We're currently exploring an idea, collaborating, discussing, > debating. All of this is IMO poorly suited to Mozilla's feature page > system. > >> On 3/11/2012 4:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:41 PM, lkcl luke <luke.leigh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> this is all really good stuff, jim. but i have to reiterate: WHERE >>>> IS IT BEING FORMALLY DOCUMENTED? please don't say "in the mailing >>>> list". >>> Once we've had a bit more of a discussion here on the list, I think we >>> should document everything both as part of the OWA documentation, as >>> well as part of the general B2G documentation. But at this point I'm >>> not sure that there is enough consensus to start editing wikis. >>> >>> / Jonas >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-security mailing list >>> dev-security@lists.mozilla.org >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-b2g mailing list >> dev-...@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list dev-security@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
