Frank Hecker: > > Yes, I'll do that. (Incidentally, I'm now calling it the "potentially > problematic practices" list, because there's a lack of consensus on the > extent to which some of these practices are problems in general.) >
Frank, where is the lack of consensus exactly? Are you referring to bug 449610? If yes, I think that Wan-Teh misunderstood the "problematic practice" issue initially and that the opposition from Nelson is rather based on the argument in regards to the UI, which isn't a policy decision. I'm against the weakening of the "Problematic Practices" page if possible, since it's still not an approved policy, but rather some guideline. Degrading it to "Potentially" makes it even less effective... ...or perhaps we can discuss this here first... I saw that Kathleen is already asking new applicants for CA cert inclusions those questions from the "Problematic Practices" which I think to be quite effective. This might also lead to some of those practices to be part of the Mozilla CA Policy... -- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: https://blog.startcom.org _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
