The language of ACCUMULO-1795 indicated that an acceptable state was something that wasn't binary compatible. That's my #1 thing to avoid.
> Maybe expressly only doing a binary convenience package for > 0.20.203.0? If we need an extra package, doesn't that mean a user can't just upgrade Accumulo? As a side note, 0.20.203.0 is 1.4, On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey...@clouderagovt.com>wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:28 PM, William Slacum < > wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net> wrote: > > > A user of 1.4.a should be able to move to 1.4.b without any "major" > > infrastructure changes, such as swapping out HDFS or installing extra > > add-ons. > > > > > > Right, exactly. Hopefully no part of the original plan contradicts this. Is > there something that appears to? > > > -- > Sean >
