I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just send as your from address as elserj-bui...@apache.org?
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost > interest in trying to make it work any further. > > Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list (dev@a.a.o) > instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of some > form to move things around anyways. > > LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it would > increase the traffic here dramatically. > > > Josh Elser wrote: >> >> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get >> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through >> normal means). >> >> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week. >> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually. >> >> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures >> on master! >> >> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers) >> >> Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> Frak. >>> >>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from >>> my server... >>> >>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>> >>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit. >>>> >>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo >>>> jobs and I can add an account for you. >>>> >>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since >>>> you brought up this discussion. >>>> >>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things >>>>> down to a specific set of jobs. >>>>> >>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to >>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT >>>>> jobs from apache jenkins. >>>>> >>>>> Mike Drob wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm >>>>>> not >>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and >>>>>> sending an email. >>>>>> >>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns? >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A >>>>>> real >>>>>> mensch! >>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be >>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service >>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some >>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right >>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control >>>>>>>> over >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be >>>>>>> >>>>>>> responsive -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to >>>>>>>> call me >>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think >>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>> >>>>>>> been >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at >>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to >>>>>>>> /dev/null, >>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find >>>>>>>> time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Christopher wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS >>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just >>>>>>>>> speculating >>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would >>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the >>>>>>>>> email >>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as >>>>>>>>>> trusted >>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be >>>>>>>>>> trusted >>>>>>>>>> by default in FF. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that >>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>> >>>>>>> run. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>> >>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the >>>>>>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh >>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I >>>>>>>>>>>>> own. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been >>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> >>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough >>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to >>>>>>> >>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests >>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on >>>>>>>>>>>>> it), >>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the >>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up >>>>>>> >>>>>>> emails >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notificati...@accumulo.apache.org list instead of >>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>> >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> myself. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions? >>>>>> >>>>>> >
