Or, maybe just set up Jenkins to tweet the results, and we can optionally follow that?
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to > add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just > send as your from address as elserj-bui...@apache.org? > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost >> interest in trying to make it work any further. >> >> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list (dev@a.a.o) >> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of some >> form to move things around anyways. >> >> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it would >> increase the traffic here dramatically. >> >> >> Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get >>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through >>> normal means). >>> >>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week. >>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually. >>> >>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures >>> on master! >>> >>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers) >>> >>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>> >>>> Frak. >>>> >>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from >>>> my server... >>>> >>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit. >>>>> >>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo >>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you. >>>>> >>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since >>>>> you brought up this discussion. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things >>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to >>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT >>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mike Drob wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and >>>>>>> sending an email. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A >>>>>>> real >>>>>>> mensch! >>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be >>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service >>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some >>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right >>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control >>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> responsive -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to >>>>>>>>> call me >>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think >>>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at >>>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to >>>>>>>>> /dev/null, >>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find >>>>>>>>> time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS >>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just >>>>>>>>>> speculating >>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would >>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the >>>>>>>>>> email >>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions >>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as >>>>>>>>>>> trusted >>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be >>>>>>>>>>> trusted >>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that >>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> run. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do >>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the >>>>>>>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh >>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been >>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough >>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it), >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notificati...@accumulo.apache.org list instead of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
