OK. I deleted the bogus webpage, so we can see if it reappears. None of the other webpages were in added to the root directory, so I think it may have been an isolated fluke of having that file placed there.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jim Gomes<e.se...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > Thanks for doing that. I think I figured out what the problem is. There > > seems to be an extra file out on the website. I'm not sure where this > file > > came from. The bogus file is here: > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/nms.html > > > > This file shouldn't be there. The proper file is > > http://activemq.apache.org/nms/index.html. If you look at those two > pages, > > they are identical, but the first one's links are all incorrect. I > checked > > the main ActiveMQ webpage to make sure that they don't link to the bogus > > webpage, and everything that I checked appears to link to the correct > > webpage. This bogus webpage has all of the latest changes to it, so I > think > > it was generated from the WIKI. I wonder if it were deleted, would it > > reappear at the next generation? Should it just be removed, or should an > > auto-forwarding page be put in its place that would forward to the > correct > > webpage? > > In a static HTML scenario, I would usually add a meta-refresh header > element to automatically push to the correct page. But since these > pages are automatically generated, that's not really an option. It > would probably be best if we removed that page and check to see if it > is automatically regenerated. > > Bruce > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" > );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >
