[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13071766#comment-13071766
]
Mark Bakker commented on AMQ-1853:
----------------------------------
I completely agree with Farhad Dehghani, it is silly to freese the complete
message delivery when some messages shoot in redelivery.
In a few weeks we are again smashing our head to the wall because of this
problem. 10M+ messages over the queue, hoping we won't get any rolbacks... Try
explaning this to a customer.
> Optional non-blocking redelivery
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1853
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1853
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0
> Reporter: Demian Mrakovich
> Fix For: NEEDS_REVIEWED
>
>
> When a message is redelivered the consumer blocks for the amount of time
> specified by the redelivery delay. For a high load scenario where message
> order is irrelevant this is just reducing performance and will result in a
> complete halt if the delay is long and several bad messages are consumed in a
> short time.
> I think what I basically wish for is how it worked in versions 3.x, prior to
> fix for AMQ-268. So I would very much like to have configurable option to NOT
> block consumers when redelivering messages.
> If no-one feels up to it, I'd still appreciate some hints and I could try to
> fix it myself. Looking at ActiveMQMessageConsumer.rollback(), I was thinking
> something in the lines of just scheduling a task to put the message back on
> queue after a delay - if configured to, instead of stopping delivery and a
> schedule a task to resume delivery again. But I do not possess an
> understanding of AMQ thorough enough to predict potential side effects of
> this, so any analysis would be helpful.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
