[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13072223#comment-13072223
 ] 

Farhad Dehghani commented on AMQ-1853:
--------------------------------------

As long as camel uses activemq as the underlying messaging system, then it may 
necessarily have the same issue. You may be able to spawn a new thread to 
handle consumption or redelivery of a message, but my guess is that the 
original consumer thread would somehow remain blocked until activemq get 
exhausted to retry according to the redelivery policy. Please correct me if I'm 
wrong. 
I have tried this with spring-integration, by setting the "concurrentConsumers" 
on the jms-listener container up to a higher value than 1, and I succeed to 
continue picking messages from the queue, but the original consumer remains 
blocked.

> Optional non-blocking redelivery
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-1853
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1853
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0
>            Reporter: Demian Mrakovich
>             Fix For: 5.6.0
>
>
> When a message is redelivered the consumer blocks for the amount of time 
> specified by the redelivery delay. For a high load scenario where message 
> order is irrelevant this is just reducing performance and will result in a 
> complete halt if the delay is long and several bad messages are consumed in a 
> short time. 
> I think what I basically wish for is how it worked in versions 3.x, prior to 
> fix for AMQ-268. So I would very much like to have configurable option to NOT 
> block consumers when redelivering messages. 
> If no-one feels up to it, I'd still appreciate some hints and I could try to 
> fix it myself. Looking at ActiveMQMessageConsumer.rollback(), I was thinking 
> something in the lines of just scheduling a task to put the message back on 
> queue after a delay - if configured to, instead of stopping delivery and a 
> schedule a task to resume delivery again. But I do not possess an 
> understanding of AMQ thorough enough to predict potential side effects of 
> this, so any analysis would be helpful.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to