[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13090111#comment-13090111 ]
Kaustubh Khasnis commented on AMQ-1853: --------------------------------------- Hi all, but doesn't JMS spec says that the message delivery should stop and start from the oldest acknowledged message?? Just a thought (reference: http://download.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/jms/Session.html#recover%28%29) > Optional non-blocking redelivery > -------------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-1853 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1853 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Wish > Components: Broker > Affects Versions: 5.1.0 > Reporter: Demian Mrakovich > Fix For: 5.6.0 > > > When a message is redelivered the consumer blocks for the amount of time > specified by the redelivery delay. For a high load scenario where message > order is irrelevant this is just reducing performance and will result in a > complete halt if the delay is long and several bad messages are consumed in a > short time. > I think what I basically wish for is how it worked in versions 3.x, prior to > fix for AMQ-268. So I would very much like to have configurable option to NOT > block consumers when redelivering messages. > If no-one feels up to it, I'd still appreciate some hints and I could try to > fix it myself. Looking at ActiveMQMessageConsumer.rollback(), I was thinking > something in the lines of just scheduling a task to put the message back on > queue after a delay - if configured to, instead of stopping delivery and a > schedule a task to resume delivery again. But I do not possess an > understanding of AMQ thorough enough to predict potential side effects of > this, so any analysis would be helpful. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira