On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Robert Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeff, > > Perhaps the best way forward would be to have 2 distros of ActiveMQ - one > without the console, and one with the old console - with clear warnings that > it is not maintained etc. Personally, I really like this option. A “minimal” distribution and a “full” distro would be great. The full distro with web console and everything is certainly useful for beginners to get started with ActiveMQ, but really anyone more advanced (or in production and such) would likely just need the minimal as they could then use whatever management capabilities they already have. I’d certainly be in full support for this idea. Dan > On 3 Jan 2014, at 16:52, jgenender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Rob, >> >> I think pulling the web console is playing the nuclear option. The >> webconsole is used all over the place. It makes AMQ more approachable for >> beginners. It would be a big detriment to remove it. >> >> That said, hawt.io is a nice technology. But regarding the other thread, I >> have to agree that in its current state, it somewhat is not in the Apache >> spirit of things. Why not leave the old console in for now, and meanwhile, >> you hawt.io folks allow the console to be skinned so it looks specific to >> ActiveMQ. That to me sounds like a win/win, *and* it would open the door to >> many other projects to leverage it. >> >> Just my .02. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Remove-the-old-ActiveMQ-Console-tp4675925p4675982.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > Rob Davies > ———————— > Red Hat, Inc > http://hawt.io - #dontcha > Twitter: rajdavies > Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
