[1] +1 -- this gives the user choice -- if they choose the old console, they accept the risks by doing so [2] -1 -- this still endorses the old console, which should be treated as deprecated, EOL, and removed [3] 0 -- this seems to be a huge can of worms, yet probably beneficial for the community [4] -1 -- this still endorses the old console, which should be treated as deprecated, EOL, and removed
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Robert Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I want to take a straw poll to see where everyone stands, because opinion has > varied, mine included. Straw polls can be a useful tool to move towards > consensus. This isn’t a formal vote, but to reduce the noise, can we keep it > to binding votes only ? > > > 1. Have one distribution with no default console, but make it easy to deploy > a console on demand (the original console - or 3rd party ones). > 2. Have two separate distributions, one with no console - and have a second > distribution with the original console > 3. One distribution, with hawtio as the console - ActiveMQ branded. > 4. One distribution, but uses the original ActiveMQ console only. > > Here’s my vote: > > [1]. +1 > [2] 0 > [3] 0 > [4] -1 > > thanks, > > Rob > -- Christian Posta http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
