[1] +1 [2] -1 since we'd be effectively endorsing deprecated, dead code which is potentially a security risk. I'd change this to a 0 if we clearly called the distro "apache-activemq-deprecated-distro" or something to highlight users are using dead, unmaintained code that probably has security vulnerabilities [3] 0 [4] -1
On 17 January 2014 13:33, Robert Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I want to take a straw poll to see where everyone stands, because opinion > has varied, mine included. Straw polls can be a useful tool to move towards > consensus. This isn’t a formal vote, but to reduce the noise, can we keep > it to binding votes only ? > > > 1. Have one distribution with no default console, but make it easy to > deploy a console on demand (the original console - or 3rd party ones). > 2. Have two separate distributions, one with no console - and have a > second distribution with the original console > 3. One distribution, with hawtio as the console - ActiveMQ branded. > 4. One distribution, but uses the original ActiveMQ console only. > > Here’s my vote: > > [1]. +1 > [2] 0 > [3] 0 > [4] -1 > > thanks, > > Rob > > -- James ------- Red Hat Email: jstra...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration
