On 17 Jan 2014, at 16:18, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Can we get a rundown of the issues with the current console? I don't > really see a lot of traffic on here complaining about it. Nobody has > really touched it in a long time, right? So, why not get some folks > who are interested in it to work on it? I'd be willing to help with > it. There are about 21 open issues in jira - but that’s not the problem. The problem is ithe console is more than 5 years out of date and needs to be completely rewritten from scratch. As always, contributions always welcome. > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Robert Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I want to take a straw poll to see where everyone stands, because opinion >> has varied, mine included. Straw polls can be a useful tool to move towards >> consensus. This isn’t a formal vote, but to reduce the noise, can we keep it >> to binding votes only ? >> >> >> 1. Have one distribution with no default console, but make it easy to deploy >> a console on demand (the original console - or 3rd party ones). >> 2. Have two separate distributions, one with no console - and have a second >> distribution with the original console >> 3. One distribution, with hawtio as the console - ActiveMQ branded. >> 4. One distribution, but uses the original ActiveMQ console only. >> >> Here’s my vote: >> >> [1]. +1 >> [2] 0 >> [3] 0 >> [4] -1 >> >> thanks, >> >> Rob >> Rob Davies ———————— Red Hat, Inc http://hawt.io - #dontcha Twitter: rajdavies Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
