James, Don't name names, but are there any actual existing real-life amq committers who you think shouldn't be pmc members? My experience has been that many projects start out with this worry but eventually decide it is pointless and a waste of time…. sort of "if they can mess with the code, lets try to get them to do the extra work of being a pmc member" :-)
Given my rather minimal involvement in amq recently I'm not likely to formally vote but I'd be +1. david jencks On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:32 AM, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > -1. Showing you have the technical chops to code (merit) != the > ability to be a good steward and act on behalf of the foundation in > order to manage the project effectively. > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Gary Tully <[email protected]> wrote: >> In that way, committers that are interested in project management >> duties can indicate same with their votes. Effectively self elect to >> step up to the task. >> >> What is the down side?
