Chris, Calm down…
*At this point* I don’t see any reason for include trademarks@ in this. Once we have some ideas to present to trademarks@, then yes. We definitely need to include them and make sure whatever we select is acceptable. Are we supposed to just send a note that says something like: "We are trying to come up with a code name for some development efforts we are working on. We have no idea what we’re going to call it yet as we’ve just started discussing possible names. Just letting you know!” That seems like a waste of time for the trademarks@ folks. Once we’ve discussed things here and and decided on a name or possible sets of names we feel are suitable, then sure. We’d log an issue at PODLINGNAMESEARCH and send a note to trademarks@ and make sure it’s OK prior to making it final. That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a name of a “Project”, it SHOULD be easier (but again, we’ll verify with trademarks@ when we’ve decided on a name). The name should always be referred to as “Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH” and never “Apache BLAH” or just “BLAH”. The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our dev list. This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache ActiveMQ-CMS we have now. Dan > On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > > See: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH > > For a framework on what to answer about names. Realize > as well that despite my repeatedly telling you guys you > need to include trademarks@ in this discussion b/c you > are bypassing the traditional way of bringing projects > into Apache by doing the due diligence necessary for naming, > you are *still not including trademarks@*. > > Please. Rectify. This. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> > Reply-To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> > Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 1:23 PM > To: ActiveMQ-Developers <dev@activemq.apache.org> > Subject: Naming Suggestions? > >> Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name >> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM >> confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to >> give it? >> >> -- >> Hiram Chirino >> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. >> hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com >> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
