I liked ng at first. But reactive made a very cool name. -- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 06:03, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > What about ActiveMQ-NG (New/Next Generation)? > > Regards > Krzysztof > >> On 09.04.2015 02:39, Jim Gomes wrote: >> I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons: >> >> 1. RS stands for Research. >> 2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say. >> 3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name. >> 4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions >> (ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.). >>> On Apr 8, 2015 3:06 PM, "Greg Stein" <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>> ... >>>> That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a >>>> name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with >>>> trademarks@ when we've decided on name). The name should always >>>> be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or >>>> just "BLAH". The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our >>>> dev list. This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache >>>> ActiveMQ-CMS we have now. >>> Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already >>> got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything >>> else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed >>> as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting >>> strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That >>> is past, so we can skip worrying about that. >>> >>> I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -g > > -- > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > JEE & OSS Architect > Apache Software Foundation Member > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair > Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC > <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
