See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH
For a framework on what to answer about names. Realize as well that despite my repeatedly telling you guys you need to include trademarks@ in this discussion b/c you are bypassing the traditional way of bringing projects into Apache by doing the due diligence necessary for naming, you are *still not including trademarks@*. Please. Rectify. This. Cheers, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> Reply-To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 1:23 PM To: ActiveMQ-Developers <dev@activemq.apache.org> Subject: Naming Suggestions? >Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name >other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM >confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to >give it? > >-- >Hiram Chirino >Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. >hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com >skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
