What version ? Can you try Artemis ?
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016, ActiveMQ Investigation < ajay.ku...@winterflood.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am doing some raw performance tests on ActiveMQ to replace SonicMQ (JMS > based) on C++ side. We have CMS using OpenWire. > My test has got five Non Durable subscribers on a Topic. When I send 25000 > messages, following happens: > > 1. Persistent - It takes 3 times (27sec) more than what it takes on SonicMQ > (9sec). I need to find out what's causing this delay and how to improve it. > I understand that publisher will wait until broker comes back to ack > messages. I am using Auto_ACK. I have looked at SonicMQ settings for IO > Buffer and socket buffer and do the same for ActiveMQ but no success. > > > 2. Non Persistent - This one is faster as fire and forget but messages are > sometime 2 seconds in flight on subscriber which is unacceptable to our use > case. I tried setting prefetch etc thinking it's slow consumer but no > success. > > Hardware is same for both. ActiveMQ install is default installation. I am > going through performance tuning guide mentioned in the forum but any quick > clues / areas to look at will be appreciated. > > Sorry if my query is too subjective but I want to find out where ActiveMQ > is > taking time and why. I have done raw tests just using stomp on ActiveMQ (No > CPP involved) and it was way faster as compared to Sonic. So I suspect, I > need to tweak some settings which may be causing it. > > > Thanks > AJ > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Performance-tp4712952.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Clebert Suconic
