Artemis is an initiative to make a new broker with similar features to ActiveMQ5 which is getting closer and closer each day.
I would say It's worth giving it a try. 1.3.0 just passed the voting, you should see the announcement soon for the release. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:56 AM, ActiveMQ Investigation <ajay.ku...@winterflood.com> wrote: > Hello Celebert, > > I am using apache-activemq-5.12.1. > > I found out the issue. My subscribers were on same machine as ActiveMQ > install. While 5 subscribers, consuming messages on same machine as install, > it was quite intensive. I moved subscribers to a separate machine than > install and it took 9 seconds to send messages and almost similar to > receive. This is about persistent messages. > > For non persistent, in new setup, it takes 1.7 seconds which is acceptable. > However, consumer (gets all msgs in 6 seconds) in is showing messages > waiting for 1+ seconds. > > > For SonicMQ, time taken is consistent irrespective of consumer on machine > where sonic install is there. > > > I feel that this 9 second is still high for sending 25000 msgs. It can do > better. Also, can this CPU and memory intensiveness improved. > > I will go through Artemis. Sorry for naive query but how different Artemis > is to ActiveMQ. I haven't explored that front. > > Thanks > AJ > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > AJ > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Performance-tp4712952p4712960.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Clebert Suconic
