Hi Victor,

Right, what I was thinking is that both the readme and the dockerfile live
in a subdirectory.  This way chroot works correctly.

John

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:50 AM Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> No we can't, dockerhub will chroot to the directory where the dockerfile is
> in, the build would be impossible.
>
> The alternative, using the root folder, will leave us in a sub-standard
> situation where the readme for the dockerhub page is the general project
> readme, just like https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/thrift/ .
>
>
>
> 2016-08-29 19:52 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
>
> > Victor,
> >
> > So just wondering.  From what I understand, docker simply pulls the
> README
> > from the current directory.  Couldn't we create a docker subdirectory in
> > the repo?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:17 PM Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear devs,
> > >
> > > I'm afraid I cannot create a good enough docker image as two
> constraints
> > > clash:
> > >
> > > - Cannot use a different repository (as per John's)
> > > - Should have a proper docker specific README.md file in the docker hub
> > > page (as per my personal preference).
> > >
> > > This won't change unless, the issue 292
> > > <https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/292> in docker hub gets
> > > fixed.
> > >
> > > I'll keep an eye on the issue in case it gets fixed (feb 18 they wrote
> > > <https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/292#
> > issuecomment-185811039>:
> > > *We
> > > have a plan in place and will provide an update as soon as we can*) ,
> and
> > > will keep maintaining my personal docker image.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-08-14 10:31 GMT-07:00 Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi John, devs
> > > >
> > > > I hear your expectations and I'm following option two, the
> > > thrift/marmotta
> > > > approach for that reason.
> > > >
> > > > There is some maintenance I'd like to happen to avoid ending up with
> > > > images like thrift, that only has *latest
> > > > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/thrift/tags/> *and not one tag per
> > each
> > > > version as I'd like it to have. I can update RELEASING.md
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/RELEASING.md
> >
> > in
> > > > the same PR with some very short instructions on how to change the
> > > version
> > > > in the Dockerfile (very simple) on every release.
> > > >
> > > > The whole *latest is meant to be SNAPSHOT* is an open and broader
> > > > discussion. But if the greater apache, as it seems, consider latest
> is
> > a
> > > > non repeatable SNAPSHOT build, I'm happy with it.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2016-08-14 9:06 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > >> Hey Victor,
> > > >>
> > > >> To clarify.  I'm expecting that a build of artemis results in the
> > > >> creation (and publishing) of a docker container.  This container
> > > represents
> > > >> the underlying build artifact.  This is known as the "latest" in
> > docker.
> > > >> When doing a release, i expect something similar.
> > > >>
> > > >> The ASF only does automatic docker builds.  Not manual.  Based on
> > input
> > > I
> > > >> got from our infra, its never a separate repo, always in the same
> > repo.
> > > >> Granted we don't have a ton of examples yet, but that seems to be
> the
> > > go-to
> > > >> (and realistically represents a true CI/CD pattern for completely
> > > running
> > > >> apps like this).
> > > >>
> > > >> The actual creation of the container is a separate step in jenkins.
> > So
> > > >> once the current dockerfile is donated, pointing to a different
> > location
> > > >> for the binary, I can carry out the steps w/ infra to setup the
> docker
> > > >> builds.  There shouldn't be a reason to point to a remote location
> for
> > > the
> > > >> binary as a result, it'll all be local to the workspace.  I'll
> > probably
> > > >> need to setup some kind of job to build releases, but shouldn't be a
> > big
> > > >> issue.
> > > >>
> > > >> You can find a few examples out on our ASF hub page -
> > > >> https://hub.docker.com/u/apache/.  Thrift is the most curious one
> > from
> > > >> my POV.  It actually builds thrift on the image, and uses an entry
> > > point to
> > > >> allow extension (e.g. execution of thrift).
> > > >>
> > > >> Also apologies, I missed that this fell off the dev list.
> > > >>
> > > >> John
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 1:30 AM Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi John,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You mentioned building SNAPSHOTs and it sounds great to me. The
> > problem
> > > >>> is that one does not just curl the latest version of a SNAPSHOT.
> > There
> > > are
> > > >>> many rolling versions
> > > >>> <
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > >
> > > >>> .
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also SNAPSHOTs would generate an interesting scenario when
> releasing
> > > >>> versions, as the docker file for a snapshot would be different than
> > the
> > > >>> dockerfile of a RELEASE. Therefor, someone (I can do it if
> necessary)
> > > has
> > > >>> to make sure the Dockerfile is updated accordingly by taking the
> > > dockerfile
> > > >>> from the latest release version (or uncomment code perhaps).
> Therefor
> > > I'd
> > > >>> discard the obvious workarounds (see below two examples):
> > > >>>
> > > >>>    - Curlling the maven metadata
> > > >>>    <
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT/
> > maven-metadata.xml
> > > >
> > > >>>    of the SNAPSHOT, and with xmlstarlet extract the latest version.
> > > >>>    - Using the nexus api
> > > >>>    <
> > > https://repository.apache.org/service/local/artifact/maven/
> > redirect?r=snapshots&g=org.apache.activemq&a=apache-artemis&v=LATEST
> > > >
> > > >>>    (although I haven been able to make it work, but just spent
> 10m).
> > > Tied to
> > > >>>    an specific maven repo software. Unclear to me how to validate
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Even if we forget about the SNAPSHOTS, there has to be a clear
> > release
> > > >>> mechanism if the dockerfile lives inside of the main repo. Because
> it
> > > does
> > > >>> download releases versions from an external site (not from the
> > > reactor) and
> > > >>> validates against a manually given signature.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The approaches I see are:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>    1. Non automatic dockerhub build. Build and upload to dockerhub
> > > >>>    using a maven plugin. Would ease maintenance. Users of dockerhub
> > > prefer
> > > >>>    automatic builds, but overall it would be great experience both
> > for
> > > users
> > > >>>    and developers. Would probably make
> > > >>>    2.  Automatic dockerhub build that actually builds Artemis in
> > > >>>    dockerhub (skipping tests). The image that is meant to be as
> small
> > > as
> > > >>>    possible, it will likely have some leftovers, probably not to
> many
> > > if done
> > > >>>    carefully. This is the same approach marmotta
> > > >>>    <https://github.com/apache/marmotta/blob/develop/Dockerfile>
> > uses.
> > > >>>    3. Use a different repo just as it is right now and ignore
> > > >>>    SNAPSHOTS. Proven to work and I'd say 99% of the dockerhub
> > projects
> > > work
> > > >>>    like that.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 3 is the current path but I'll discard it for one single reason: no
> > > >>> other apache project seems to follow it.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Personally I don't want to go through the 1 route, as it would
> > require
> > > >>> the apache dockerhub credentials to be store in the apache CI. And
> > I'm
> > > sure
> > > >>> someone, somewhere would have problems with that. Otherwise is a
> > > perfectly
> > > >>> valid approach.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So unless you have any other idea, I'd go for the option 2 as soon
> > as I
> > > >>> can.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2016-08-12 19:58 GMT-07:00 Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi John,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Apologies I have just arrived back from a travel. I'll put it
> > together
> > > >>>> this very weekend and I'll let you know.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks for the help.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 2016-08-12 18:56 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com
> >:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hey Victor,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Just wondering if you were able to get this together?
> > Unfortunately,
> > > >>>>> the ActiveMQ permissions don't let me assign to you.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> John
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 6:41 PM Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Nice! Feel free to assign to me : "vromero".
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 2016-07-29 15:10 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <
> john.d.am...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Also, I created a ticket in JIRA for this:
> > > https://issues.apache.or
> > > >>>>>>> g/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-658
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> John
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:58 PM John D. Ament <
> > > >>>>>>> john.d.am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hi Victor,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Basically, that's a working example of how ASF does docker
> > builds.
> > > >>>>>>>> They setup an automated build per branch.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> John
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:37 PM Victor <
> victor.rom...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi John,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thank you! Excellent stuff, I'll take care of it. BTW yes I'm
> > in
> > > >>>>>>>>> dev@active.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> The only thing I don't fully comprehend is the thrift one.
> How
> > > >>>>>>>>> does thrift applies here?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> 2016-07-29 13:29 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <
> > john.d.am...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Ok, I just dug around a bit on how we have docker setup.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Everything is an automated build, so we can have it build
> > based
> > > on the code
> > > >>>>>>>>>> in Artemis.  I would recommend as a first step to raise a PR
> > to
> > > contribute
> > > >>>>>>>>>> the dockerfile and entry point to the artemis repo.  I can
> > > setup a build
> > > >>>>>>>>>> then in docker hub to build our master.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Some minor changes:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - Instead of downloading from the mirrors, download the
> > artifact
> > > >>>>>>>>>> from the repository, this way we can do 1.4 snapshots in
> > > addition to the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> released binaries.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - You may want to base it on thrift, https://github.com/apa
> > > >>>>>>>>>> che/thrift
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - Make sure ASF license headers are present.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> John
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:06 PM John D. Ament <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> john.d.am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hey Victor,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Are you already subscribed on dev@activemq?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Basically from what I understand, we do automated builds
> into
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the docker hub.  So we wouldn't directly bring in your
> image,
> > > but if you
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> have the source code we can implement it as a partof our
> > build.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> What do you use to build your docker container?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> John
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> From: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:52 PM
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Contributing to the Apache Docker Account
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> To: Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com>, <
> > dev@activemq.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> But yes I'll take care of it
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 2016 15:51, "John D. Ament" <
> > johndam...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I believe that's an infra question
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 2016 15:47, "Bruce Snyder" <
> > bruce.sny...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well so far nobody has responded. So I have no idea who
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> controls it. We need to find out who controls access to
> the
> > > ASF account at
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Docker Hub.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bruce
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Victor <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> victor.rom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bruce,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any information would be highly appreciated.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-13 15:43 GMT-07:00 Bruce Snyder <
> > bsny...@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John, can you help out Victor with his request to
> > > contribute
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his image to the ASF account at Docker Hub? It looks
> like
> > > you were the last
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one to respond to Victor's request who has knowledge of
> > > the ASF account at
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Docker Hub.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone else who can help Victor get his Docker
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> image contributed so that it can be listed under the
> ASF
> > > account at Docker
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hub?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bruce
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ted Husted <human-respo...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:52 PM
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Contributing to the Apache Docker Account
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Victor <victor.rom...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: bsny...@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your inquiry.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Artemis is a subproject of ActiveMQ, the best person
> > to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact with this question is the ActiveMQ PMC Chair.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe Bruce Snyder is the current PMC Chair.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may also wish to refer to the project's
> Contributing
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://activemq.apache.org/contributing.html
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps, Ted Husted.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Member Emeritus, Apache Software Foundation.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * http://www.apache.org/foundation/preFAQ.html
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Victor <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> victor.rom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Apache,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since Sep 27, 2015 I have  an Apache Artemis docker
> > image
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on docker hub
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://hub.docker.com/r/vromero/activemq-artemis/>
> (>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 700 installations, 1 pull request, 1 stackoverflow and
> > no
> > > complains).
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have already shared it with the Apache Artemis team
> > and
> > > it seems to be a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> common agreement (between the few that replied the
> > thread
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-dev/
> > 201604.mbox/%3CCAOqetn8FG_Yz+eqFXuE=oxD1hKjepBgOLqy63Eq3A22EPuNoOg
> > @mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that if contributed it should be in the Apache docker
> > > user.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although there seems to be no specific Apache contact
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related to Docker. That is why I'm writting you.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm specifically looking for someone to ask for any
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific the process and artifacts that might be
> > > required. I already signed
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the contributors agreement, I'm looking for things
> like
> > > special
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, move it to a given repo, etc.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perl -e 'print unpack("u35",
> > > "\@0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)S;GED9
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)\`87!A8VAE+F]R9PH\`");'
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to