Hi Antoine, I am on UTC time, usually around on IRC from 9am - 5pm. Feel free to ping me.
Cheers On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected]> wrote: > Great! I am tmio on IRC, when is a good time to catch you? I tried to find > you when I filed the bug but was probably too late in your day. > > > On Nov 4, 2016, at 12:23 PM, Martyn Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Antoine, > > > > I'm sorry your issue has not been addressed yet, I've been meaning to > look > > into this myself, but have been snowed under with other things recently. > > We should be able to get this resolved and into to a release soon. > > > > I'm more than happy to help you get started with the code base, the IRC > > channels is great for this type of discussion. My nick is martyntaylor > > feel free to ping me, > > > > Thanks > > Martyn > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > >> I would absolutely love to help with a fix. That’s why I created the bug > >> and provided reproduction steps. > >> > >> However I was stomped with the code itself and have had no luck > >> reproducing this at smaller scale. > >> > >> I did ask on the mailing list for help and steps to help move this > forward > >> further. Your help in unblocking me, from pointing which area of the > code > >> would be a likely culprit, to pointing me to better instructions to > debug > >> interactions in cluster with finer logging, > >> helping me understand better the messaging model of symmetric clusters, > >> or hinting at the status of MQTT support and what to reliably expect > would > >> be very appreciated. > >> > >>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Clebert Suconic < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> We had a lot of fixed done on 1.5.0… > >>> > >>> I guess it wasn't clear if your issue was a configuration issue or an > >>> actual bug. But we try to fix as many issues we can between each > >>> releases. We will get there eventually, maybe you could even give us > >>> hand on the fix? that's the beauty of open source. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> I have just tried the release bits with the bug I reported > >> (ARTEMIS-806) and I see the same incorrect behavior, where MQTT > subscribers > >> are not notified of messages published to another node in the cluster. > >>>> > >>>> I therefore am casting +0 (non-binding). > >>>> > >>>>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Christopher Shannon < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 (binding) > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Fabio Gomes dos Santos < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2016-11-03 19:29 GMT-02:00 Clebert Suconic < > [email protected] > >>> : > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache Artemis 1.5.0 release. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1.5.0 has these new features as highlights. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-724] - Implement no-local consumer support in AMQP > >>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-737] - Add JUnit Rules > >>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-743] - Default the queue address to the queue name > >>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-753] - Persist pause status after restart of the broker. > >>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-756] - Add basic CDI integration > >>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-824] - Management operations for creating and destroying > >>>>>>> connector services > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And many other fixes as part of this release, the complete release > >>>>>>> notes can be found here: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > >>>>>>> version=12338118&styleName=Html&projectId=12315920&Create=Create > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The binary distributions can be found here: > >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1109/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.5.0/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The source archives can be found here: > >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1109/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.5.0/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The Maven repository is here: > >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1109/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The source tag: > >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis. > >>>>>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.5.0 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The project website for that version has been staged to: > >>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~clebertsuconic/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 1.4.0 > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Here's my (binding) +1 vote > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Fábio Santos > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Clebert Suconic > >> > >> > >
