> Yes, I think a Vote is a good idea. Makes it very clear, and follows > established Apache process, and gives a definite cut-off point. >
Ok, but so far you are the only one to be convinced. > Does that duplicate the entire Git repository? It kind of looks like it > does. Git is very light. it is not really an issue. We do it all the time on many different projects. As a matter of fact.. I constantly switch branches between 1.x and master all the time on artemis. People do it on ActiveMQ5. If that was a good technical reason we would need to switch back to SVN on Artemis and ActiveMQ.. I don't think anyone would really aprove that. However, I'm not sure if you are talking about the many directories as part of the repo. We would likely have these sub-directories as part of the git repo: Apache.NMS/ Apache.NMS.AMQP/ Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ/ Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ.Openwire.Generator/ Apache.NMS.EMS/ Apache.NMS.MQTT/ Apache.NMS.MSMQ/ Apache.NMS.Pooled/ Apache.NMS.Stomp/ Apache.NMS.WCF/ Apache.NMS.XMS/ Apache.NMS.ZMQ/ Just like you do when you check-out activemq5 or artemis with all the modules available. > > >> > repository auto-generated sequential number. Does anyone have any >> > suggestions on how to accomplish a similar reproducible build using Git? >> > >> >> you don't need really need that, you can use the Hash as the version >> ID if you require the git. >> >> You just increment the version as everybody else does. >> > > I thought everyone else used the Subversion number the way I do. I manually > increment the <major>, <minor> and <rev> numbers, and generate the <build> > number automatically. It is not possible to embed a hash number into a > build number, so I'm not clear on what you are suggesting. > You can just tag when you make a release. It's not really an issue. > >> It's just a matter of you getting used with git. >> > > I can get used to Git. I've used many version control systems (RCS, VCS, > PVCS, SourceSafe, Perforce, Subversion, Mercurial, etc.). So, I look to > those more experienced to help migrate to it. I see that it has advantages, > but it also has disadvantages.
