+1

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On 12/04/2017 03:32 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
>> Following on from the discussion, "[DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the
>> ActiveMQ project roadmap"
>>
>> linked here for convenience :
>> - http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Confusion-surr
>> ounding-the-ActiveMQ-project-roadmap-td4732935.html
>> - http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-Confusion-
>> surrounding-the-ActiveMQ-project-roadmap-td4733148.html
>>
>>
>> I would like to propose a vote on ActiveMQ Artemis mainline becoming
>> ActiveMQ 6.
>>
>> [+1] -  agree
>> [-1] . - disagree and provide some reason
>> [0] - neutral but go ahead
>>
>> This vote will be open until Thursday, Dec 07 by the end of the day.
>>
>> Here is my +1 (PMC) vote.
>>
>>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>

Reply via email to