-1
agree with Rob
Hadrian
On 12/05/2017 05:17 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
[0] - without a clear migration path and tooling to assist existing users
moving from ActiveMQ 5 to Artemis, we risk abandoning those users - who may
then be forced to look at alternatives and abandon ActiveMQ all together. This
could be counter productive to the original intent.
On 4 Dec 2017, at 20:32, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
Following on from the discussion, "[DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the
ActiveMQ project roadmap"
linked here for convenience :
-
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Confusion-surrounding-the-ActiveMQ-project-roadmap-td4732935.html
-
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-Confusion-surrounding-the-ActiveMQ-project-roadmap-td4733148.html
I would like to propose a vote on ActiveMQ Artemis mainline becoming ActiveMQ 6.
[+1] - agree
[-1] . - disagree and provide some reason
[0] - neutral but go ahead
This vote will be open until Thursday, Dec 07 by the end of the day.
Here is my +1 (PMC) vote.
