artnaseef wrote
> Please don't get too discouraged.  My vote personally was a request to
> slow
> down and discuss.  I'm just not at a point where I'm ready for "ActiveMQ
> Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6".
> 
> We have this cycle of communication in which a vote goes out and generates
> a
> ton of discussion (often heated).  Then we go quiet.  Months or years
> pass,
> and then we do it again.
> 
> Let's change that!  We are all passionate about messaging and there's a
> ton
> of great knowledge here.
> 
> I look forward to Bruce working on a roadmap, and providing input on the
> same.  Thank you Bruce.  (Please correct me if I read it wrong).

+1000!

Well said Art!



--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html

Reply via email to