artnaseef wrote > Please don't get too discouraged. My vote personally was a request to > slow > down and discuss. I'm just not at a point where I'm ready for "ActiveMQ > Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6". > > We have this cycle of communication in which a vote goes out and generates > a > ton of discussion (often heated). Then we go quiet. Months or years > pass, > and then we do it again. > > Let's change that! We are all passionate about messaging and there's a > ton > of great knowledge here. > > I look forward to Bruce working on a roadmap, and providing input on the > same. Thank you Bruce. (Please correct me if I read it wrong).
+1000! Well said Art! -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html