I agree. I have not and will not start any attacks of that sort.
However, I must respond and defend anything inbound in a public forum.
On 12/7/17 9:49 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
I'm sorry but I need to jump in here. The rhetoric in this discussion is
not only unnecessary but it is also highly unproductive. Instead of
resorting to petty disagreements, let's stop responding to this thread and
find a more productive topic on which to focus your energy.
Knock it off and go write some code.
Bruce
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Jeff- Lol.. whatever and you have never partnered with Red Hat?
On 12/6/17 5:43 PM, jgenender wrote:
I'm sorry... just when we move forward, we take 2 steps back.
Matt Pavlovich-2 wrote
I agree. I don't work for Red Hat either, but we do a ton of ActiveMQ
work and have products that support ActiveMQ. Artemis looks to be the
future and working to align the community to that end is a good thing
imo.
No... you don't work for Red Hat, but a solid business partner for sure!
No
connections!
https://mediadriver.com/red-hat/
Come on guys.... lets stop the games... time to move on, no? This is
getting kind of out of hand... don't you agree?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.
html
