It is more important to make sure the release has appropriate LICENSE files, and any other requirements Apache License rules include on releases... (e.g. signatures on the maven repository).
There is a pending PR here for these changes as soon as the native bits is released, if you really want to test the changes. (I already tested it though, and it's fine). https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2570 On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:55 PM michael.andre.pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > > Without sounding silly. How am i meant to check this?Currently its a lib but > as we dont have the activemq artemis bit removed in master and dependency on > it i cannot build artemis with it and check its behaviour.Do you have a > branch in artemis that we can use that builds based on the dependency?Sent > from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. > -------- Original message --------From: Justin Bertram <[email protected]> > Date: 05/03/2019 16:57 (GMT+00:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: > [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.0 (RC2) LGTM+1JustinOn Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at > 10:52 AM Gary Tully <[email protected]> wrote:> +1>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at > 01:25, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> > I would like > to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.0> > release. This is a > second re-spin.> >> > This is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis Native,> >> > > Source distribution can be found here:> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis-native/1.0.0/> > >> > Maven repository is here:> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1179> >> > >> > The source tag:> >> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis-native.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0.0> > >> >> >> > Notice this is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis, and the > release> > notes will be part of the main component. And also, the binary > here is> > distributed through maven.> >> >> > [ ] +1 approve the release as > Apache Artemis 2.4.0> > [ ] +0 no opinion> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason > why)> >> >> > Here's my +1> >> >> > --> > Clebert Suconic> -- Clebert Suconic
