That doesnt sound silly at all. Excellent question, well asked. Trying things out is useful when voting to release it :)
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 17:55, michael.andre.pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > > Without sounding silly. How am i meant to check this?Currently its a lib but > as we dont have the activemq artemis bit removed in master and dependency on > it i cannot build artemis with it and check its behaviour.Do you have a > branch in artemis that we can use that builds based on the dependency?Sent > from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. > -------- Original message --------From: Justin Bertram <[email protected]> > Date: 05/03/2019 16:57 (GMT+00:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: > [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.0 (RC2) LGTM+1JustinOn Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at > 10:52 AM Gary Tully <[email protected]> wrote:> +1>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at > 01:25, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> > I would like > to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.0> > release. This is a > second re-spin.> >> > This is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis Native,> >> > > Source distribution can be found here:> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis-native/1.0.0/> > >> > Maven repository is here:> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1179> >> > >> > The source tag:> >> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis-native.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0.0> > >> >> >> > Notice this is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis, and the > release> > notes will be part of the main component. And also, the binary > here is> > distributed through maven.> >> >> > [ ] +1 approve the release as > Apache Artemis 2.4.0> > [ ] +0 no opinion> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason > why)> >> >> > Here's my +1> >> >> > --> > Clebert Suconic>
