As i stated i am happy to update the content though it wont be this week. So if releasing the new site having that content (which is on current site so it is being removed if we were to release) is a blocker for you or robbie. We have three options to go forward as i see it.
1) Revert that commit, release the new site and then ill update that area of content (i cant do it this week though ive explained on chat to justin as to why) 2) hold releasing the new site until its updated by me 3) someone else updates the content sooner, and then release. Get Outlook for Android On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:08 PM +0000, "Timothy Bish" <[email protected]> wrote: On 3/28/19 5:47 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Changed to -1 due to recent commit removing an nms project. Will change back > if thats reverted. As flagged in seperate threads. > No released NMS project was removed. The removed bits were related to an original attempt at an NMS.AMQP client that was never completed and the source has since been removed, this content should have been removed a long time ago but that ball got dropped. The source code in the NMS.AMQP git repo is a different work and was never released either and requires work to get it into a releasable state, as well as a completely new set of site docs once released. If you are volunteering to do that work that's great. As Robbie stated in the other website mail thread, the bits removed from the website was of no benefit to the user as it reference a non-existent work. Further since the NMS.AMQP bits are not released the foundation policy on publication of released work prohibits pointing users towards unreleased works. You can update your knowledge on the release policy here: http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#publication > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:21 PM +0000, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > Regards > JB > > On 27/03/2019 21:07, Justin Bertram wrote: >> As most of you probably know there's been work underway to update the >> ActiveMQ website for the better part of a year. That work has reached a >> point where it makes sense to vote on whether or not it should replace the >> existing website. The new website is available at: >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/ >> >> All existing links for *ActiveMQ 5.x* content should continue to work as-is. >> >> The source files for the new site are hosted here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/ >> >> This repo includes instructions on how to modify, test, & update the site. >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve the promotion of the new website to be the official ActiveMQ >> website >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> >> Justin >> -- Tim Bish
