I have built and staged the current version, the only updated page was http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/components/nms/providers/amqp/
I made the following change first to move the note up top for visibility and expand it a little, plus update a link: https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/commit/c88f6f932138648b611c1b83296748c8c6343c34 Robbie On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 09:34, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ive add a bit more to that holding page. I need to still build and publish > the change. But will have to wait till later once im back out of work. > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:52 PM +0000, "Robbie Gemmell" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I made the original change as an fix, to improve what I considered > another broken bit of the site I had found while working on it in > recent days. I am fairly baffled that you would consider the site > suitable for usage with that invalid junk content for a deleted > component restored to place, but think it unsuable now. > > I won't personally revert the original commit. Someone else can feel > free. It is here: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-website.git;a=commitdiff;h=ba463fd8144b155731f835d70949c24df48ffc58 > > That said, I am not looking to hold up use of the new site over the > presence of a link to some useless content. Thats not why I've spent a > bunch of my time improving and fixing things over the last couple days > so that I didn't need to cast a -1 vote myself. > > I have as such restored an entry for AMQP to the NMS page, linking to > the amqp provider area that existed, which now notes simply that the > component will provide AMQP 1.0 support upon release. The change is > staged here: > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/components/nms/documentation > (which in turn links to > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/components/nms/providers/amqp/) > > I also consider that more functional than what was there to start > with. If this change is not sufficient for you, then we will indeed > need to wait for you or someone else to improve things. I will note > again that I dont think the new bits can/should be documented on that > same user-facing page yet since they have not been released, but they > can happily be documented on some developer-facing page however. > > Robbie > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 22:29, wrote: > > > > As i stated i am happy to update the content though it wont be this week. > > So if releasing the new site having that content (which is on current site > > so it is being removed if we were to release) is a blocker for you or > > robbie. We have three options to go forward as i see it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Revert that commit, release the new site and then ill update that area > > of content (i cant do it this week though ive explained on chat to justin > > as to why) > > > > > > > > > > 2) hold releasing the new site until its updated by me > > > > > > > > > > 3) someone else updates the content sooner, and then release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:08 PM +0000, "Timothy Bish" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/28/19 5:47 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > Changed to -1 due to recent commit removing an nms project. Will change > > > back if thats reverted. As flagged in seperate threads. > > > > > No released NMS project was removed. The removed bits were related to > > an original attempt at an NMS.AMQP client that was never completed and > > the source has since been removed, this content should have been removed > > a long time ago but that ball got dropped. The source code in the > > NMS.AMQP git repo is a different work and was never released either and > > requires work to get it into a releasable state, as well as a completely > > new set of site docs once released. If you are volunteering to do that > > work that's great. > > > > As Robbie stated in the other website mail thread, the bits removed from > > the website was of no benefit to the user as it reference a non-existent > > work. Further since the NMS.AMQP bits are not released the foundation > > policy on publication of released work prohibits pointing users towards > > unreleased works. You can update your knowledge on the release policy > > here: http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#publication > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:21 PM +0000, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > On 27/03/2019 21:07, Justin Bertram wrote: > > >> As most of you probably know there's been work underway to update the > > >> ActiveMQ website for the better part of a year. That work has reached a > > >> point where it makes sense to vote on whether or not it should replace > > >> the > > >> existing website. The new website is available at: > > >> > > >> http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/ > > >> > > >> All existing links for *ActiveMQ 5.x* content should continue to work > > >> as-is. > > >> > > >> The source files for the new site are hosted here: > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/ > > >> > > >> This repo includes instructions on how to modify, test, & update the > > >> site. > > >> > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 approve the promotion of the new website to be the official > > >> ActiveMQ > > >> website > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >> > > >> Here's my +1 > > >> > > >> > > >> Justin > > >> > > > > -- > > Tim Bish > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
