The more I think about it I think I am also in favor of a separate repo per plugin for the reasons Andy stated. I think it will be quite common where some plugins have low activity and not updated much and others are quite active and it would be pretty confusing to be releasing several versions of a plugin that hasn't changed.
Keep the scope small and have things be released independently. On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:14 AM Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Id personally pefer a single repo per plugin, some plugins will develop > quicker than others and with a single repo you would end up tagging and > releasing plugins that havent changed. I dont think there is an overhead > with using maven etc. > > I also think there should be no tight coupling between the plugin and the > broker apart from implementing a specific API that should be set in stone. > Even better would be the ability to just to drop a war or jar into the lib > dir and have it deployed automagically via annotations on the class or > method perhaps. > > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 22:58, <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> wrote: > > > I just want it clarified what will be the rules of adopting a new plugin > > or extension. Likewise the rule for archiving/killing off dead ones. > > > > > > > > > > And that is applied generically. > > > > > > > > > > E.g. > > > > > > > > > > At least one pmc member needs to sponsor (doesnt have to be the committer > > or contributor) > > > > > > > > > > Any third party dependency plugin including dependency to third party > > client jar must be apache license approved. (E.g. we can have plugin or > > extension for a closed source commerical tool) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just want the criteria decides agreed and documented up front to avoid > > less issues later on what can go in and what cant > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:27 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic" < > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All questions need to be same > > > > @Michael Pearce perhaps it's my english as second language here, but > > this to me sounded like "All your basis are belong to us" :) > > > > Can you explain what you meant here? > > > > > > > > > > > > >
