I thought it had already been decided that 5.16 would continue to support JDK 8 but run under either JDK. I wonder if the JDK11 support could be templated or conditionally selected with different build profiles so it could be merged into the release branch?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 10:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi guys, > > New update about the ActiveMQ releases. > > I only have one Jira to address. It will be fixed today. > > So, I plan to submit 5.15.12 to vote tonight and 5.16.0 tomorrow or during > the weekend. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 28 janv. 2020 à 13:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a > écrit : > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I would like to move forward on ActiveMQ releases: > > > > - ActiveMQ 5.15.12 > > I'm preparing several dependency updates and important fixes on the > > activemq-5.15.x branch. It includes some security fixes, postgresql jdbc > > store performance improvements, ... > > I have some PRs under review and on the fly, so, I plan to submit > > 5.15.12 to vote next week. > > > > - ActiveMQ 5.16.0 > > I did a full pass (standalone and in Apache Karaf) with JDK 11. The > > broker works without problem, including on Karaf 4.2.8. > > However, it's not currently possible to fully build with JDK 11. I have > > a branch where I did the required changes (remove the use of tools.jar > > in openwire generator, add annotation and jaxb dependency in different > > modules, update scala for leveldb, ...). > > The question that I have is about what's the exact target for 5.16.0: > > 1. We still build ActiveMQ 5.16.x with JDK8, but it supports both JDK8 > > or JDK11 at runtime. > > 2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only > > support JDK11 at runtime. > > Thoughts ? > > Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me > > know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime). > > > > Regards > > JB > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > jbono...@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > >
