Hi, ActiveMQ 5.16.0 will still be build with JDK8 but fully support JDK11+ at runtime (standalone or Karaf embedded).
That’s the target and it’s fair enough. ActiveMQ 5.17.0 will both include JMS 2.0 support + build with JDK 11. Regards JB > Le 5 mars 2020 à 23:21, W B D <w...@users.sourceforge.net> a écrit : > > I thought it had already been decided that 5.16 would continue to support > JDK 8 but run under either JDK. I wonder if the JDK11 support could be > templated or conditionally selected with different build profiles so it > could be merged into the release branch? > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 10:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> New update about the ActiveMQ releases. >> >> I only have one Jira to address. It will be fixed today. >> >> So, I plan to submit 5.15.12 to vote tonight and 5.16.0 tomorrow or during >> the weekend. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >>> Le 28 janv. 2020 à 13:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a >> écrit : >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I would like to move forward on ActiveMQ releases: >>> >>> - ActiveMQ 5.15.12 >>> I'm preparing several dependency updates and important fixes on the >>> activemq-5.15.x branch. It includes some security fixes, postgresql jdbc >>> store performance improvements, ... >>> I have some PRs under review and on the fly, so, I plan to submit >>> 5.15.12 to vote next week. >>> >>> - ActiveMQ 5.16.0 >>> I did a full pass (standalone and in Apache Karaf) with JDK 11. The >>> broker works without problem, including on Karaf 4.2.8. >>> However, it's not currently possible to fully build with JDK 11. I have >>> a branch where I did the required changes (remove the use of tools.jar >>> in openwire generator, add annotation and jaxb dependency in different >>> modules, update scala for leveldb, ...). >>> The question that I have is about what's the exact target for 5.16.0: >>> 1. We still build ActiveMQ 5.16.x with JDK8, but it supports both JDK8 >>> or JDK11 at runtime. >>> 2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only >>> support JDK11 at runtime. >>> Thoughts ? >>> Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me >>> know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime). >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >>
