Any update on this? On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 00:30 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I feel like we are stuck again on Infra. > > On the clone for artemis someone suggested asking for help in > build.Apache.org which I then answered we just need help and authorization > to upload stuff > > > Anyone have any insight!? > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:33 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Not yet. INFRA has assigned that task, but not taken any action on the > > request. I’ll nudge for an update. > > > > > On Feb 24, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Do you have a Jenkins job already aligned to build it ? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:19 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I’m prepping the PR for 5.17.0. Please provide feedback on the JIRA. > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >>> On Feb 24, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Any update on this? I've just seen that Victor Romero archived his > > >>> unofficial docker image. :( > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 4:57 PM Clebert Suconic < > > >> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I'm following up on that JIRA ticket. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:57 AM Clebert Suconic > > >>>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks Matt, I thought you already had some information about > changes > > >>>>> on Infra. I had misunderstood you. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:33 AM Matt Pavlovich < > mattr...@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi Clebert- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I do not have all the info yet, INFRA has assigned the ticket but > > not > > >>>> started working on it =) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -Matt > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2021, at 9:25 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > >>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I tried to follow the JIRA on Infra and I did not see much > > >>>> information about it. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> What's the procedure to upload images? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The only thing I saw was this JIRA: But it seemed you would be > > >>>>>>> uploading images manually? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21430 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Isn't there an official way to provide the images? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In artemis we have a docker module where you would build the > > binaries > > >>>>>>> and create the image. We would just need to add that to a Jenkins > > >>>>>>> build and produce an image whenever a tag is created. > > >>>>>>> I suppose ActiveMQ branch would do the same... > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> How this is supposed to work? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> thank you > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 4:13 PM Matt Pavlovich < > mattr...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The initial features list and notes in the JIRA reflect this > > >>>> approach. I’ll start on the module and push a PR this weekend. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>> Matt > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2021, at 2:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre < > > j...@nanthrax.net > > >>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I agree, I think it’s the most convenient approach. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> For instance, at Karaf, I maintain a Dockerfile as part of the > > >>>> codebase: > > https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/assemblies/docker > > >> < > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/assemblies/docker> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> As part of a Karaf release, I’m pushing Karaf docker image. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> However, anyone can start from the Karaf Dockerfile to create > > >>>> their own one (we also provide a goal on the karaf-maven-plugin to > do > > >> so). > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I think ActiveMQ (at least classic) should just provide a > > >>>> Dockerfile (or a set) and push "official" docker images. But still > > >> letting > > >>>> people to create their own. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>>> JB > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Le 17 févr. 2021 à 19:51, Hossack, Etienne > > >>>> <ehoss...@amazon.com.INVALID> a écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>> Following this discussion with interest, since I greatly enjoy > > >>>> the portability and consistency that Docker provides. > > >>>>>>>>>> I have some questions about the Dockerfile linked above that > > >>>> might be best served in a code review, but a more holistic question > I > > >>>> wanted to ask: > > >>>>>>>>>> Does ActiveMQ need to publish the Dockerfile? > > >>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, simply defining the image then documenting its > > >>>> location (README, website) and how to use it would add value to many > > >>>> consumers. > > >>>>>>>>>> That way: > > >>>>>>>>>> * The Dockerfile code can live within the ActiveMQ repository > > and > > >>>> be close to the code > > >>>>>>>>>> * Anyone who wishes to consume the dockerfile can (Apache 2.0 > > >>>> license) through their own build process > > >>>>>>>>>> * The ActiveMQ community does not need to maintain any > > additional > > >>>> infrastructure, release process, repositories, dependencies. > > >>>>>>>>>> * The Dockerfile can and should be independent of particular > > >>>> binaries < > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/#env > > >>> > > >>>> whenever possible, but even if not, this way each active branch > would > > be > > >>>> the source of truth for a functioning Dockerfile (can build and run > > >> tests > > >>>> on the version), and no incremental versions would have to be > > published. > > >>>>>>>>>> I think we could gain lots of value for little investment this > > >>>> way. What do you think? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>> Étienne > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> P.S. should I add the questions on the JIRA ticket as well? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Étienne Hossack > > >>>>>>>>>> Software Development Engineer, Amazon MQ > > >>>>>>>>>> email: ehoss...@amazon.com <mailto:ehoss...@amazon.com> > > >>>>>>>>>> phone: +1-778-945-8287 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Clebert Suconic < > > >>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com <mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the > > organization. > > >>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the > > sender > > >>>> and know the content is safe. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to do the same with Artemis... we already > have > > >>>> scripts to > > >>>>>>>>>>> build the images as part of the build.. we just don't have > the > > >>>> builds yet. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < > > >>>>>>>>>>> jenki...@nationwide.com <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> > > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Quick introduction: My name is Rod. I work with Chuck. I > am > > >>>> stepping in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> while he is out. I am the coworker who does the TomEE > images. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a question on the tarballs on > > https://archive.apache.org > > >>>> <https://archive.apache.org/> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://repo1.maven.org <https://repo1.maven.org/>. I > > noticed > > >>>> that the images are not the same SHA > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and not the same size. Is there a reason for that? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, the Dockerfile is mostly complete, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile > > >>>> < > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile > > >>>>> . > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think the only thing left was getting the maven download > to > > >>>> work as the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fallback to the other repos. I can still make that work, > but > > I > > >>>> thought it > > >>>>>>>>>>>> was strange to see a difference in the sizes of the files. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> This is what we are proposing. I am going to start on the > > >>>> other options > > >>>>>>>>>>>> later today. We would be happy for any feedback. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rod. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *From: *"Shank, Charles R" <shan...@nationwide.com <mailto: > > >>>> shan...@nationwide.com>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 8:49 AM > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *To: *Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto: > > >>>> j...@nanthrax.net>>, Matt Pavlovich < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> mattr...@gmail.com <mailto:mattr...@gmail.com>>, " > > >>>> dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>" < > > >>>> dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc: *"Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <jenki...@nationwide.com > > >>>> <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jean, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree we should make this its own issue and open up the > > >>>> discussion to > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the ActiveMQ community > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, we are working on the following repository to > > >>>> provide generic > > >>>>>>>>>>>> images available to the ActiveMQ community. You can follow > > our > > >>>> progress > > >>>>>>>>>>>> here: *https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq < > > >>>> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq < > > >>>> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq>>* > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Because the needs of the community are varied, we recommend > > >>>> making > > >>>>>>>>>>>> multiple versions of ActiveMQ classic and Artemis. The > repos > > >>>> also will be > > >>>>>>>>>>>> created to include OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. We also > > recommend > > >>>> leaving > > >>>>>>>>>>>> room for other operating systems other than Debian and > > multiple > > >>>> versions of > > >>>>>>>>>>>> JDK within both OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Given the number of options, we are not sure how we would go > > >>>> about using a > > >>>>>>>>>>>> module to maintain the dockerfiles, but would be open to > it. > > >>>> Once we get > > >>>>>>>>>>>> our dockerimages complete, we can discuss how they are > > >>>> maintained going > > >>>>>>>>>>>> forward. We will also investigate with the folks at > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-library < > > >>>> https://github.com/docker-library> to see what is required to get > > our > > >>>>>>>>>>>> images listed as the official images. I have a coworker > that > > is > > >>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for the TomEE official images and has some > > contacts > > >>>> there. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> We would like to get the communities thoughts and input on > > this > > >>>> course of > > >>>>>>>>>>>> action. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Chuck Shank > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [image: cid:image001.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0 > > >>>> <cid:image001.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0>] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [image: cid:image002.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0 > > >>>> <cid:image002.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0>] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Clebert Suconic > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Clebert Suconic > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Clebert Suconic > > >>>> > > >> > > >> -- > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
